ACF’s Annual Monitoring Report: the problems in the anti-corruption institutions in 2020 are escalating

Today, The Anti-Corruption Fund (ACF) presented the findings of its annual monitoring report on the investigations of high-level corruption in Bulgaria “Anti-corruption Institutions: Escalating Problems.” The report aims to provide a detailed answer to the question of the results of the fight against political corruption in Bulgaria in the last six years.
“There are already enough completed cases, which lends the opportunity to highlight many worrying trends. We can conclude that in 2020 the problems of the fight against political corruption in Bulgaria are further escalating,” conclude the authors of the report Andrey Yankulov and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Natalia Kiselova.
This report is a continuation of the annual independent civil monitoring of cases of (alleged) corruption crimes and conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government, which ACF launched last year.
The monitoring consists of two parts: (1) analysis of 45 significant criminal proceedings in cases of corruption at the highest levels of government, at the pre-trial and judicial phase for the period 2014-2020, (5 new cases were added for 2020 and the development of pending cases from the last year’s report was monitored) and (2) evaluation of decisions on reports of conflict of interest of the Commission for Anti-corruption and the Forfeiture of Illegally Acquired Property (CAFIAP) for 2020. Additionally, the analysis examined 18 cases of criminal prosecution for alleged corruption behavior at the highest levels of local government, which give a similar picture to the situation at the central level.
Some of the key conclusions that have found place in the report:
– The low efficiency of the criminal prosecution of high-level corruption found in last year’s ACF monitoring report is declining even more in 2020. The new sentences that came into force are only acquittals, which gives a ratio so far of a total of 13 final acquittals against only 3 convictions. This share is much lower than usual for successful charges of the Bulgarian Prosecutor’s Office.
– There is still no corruption crime punished with effective imprisonment. No final conviction has been reached in the last three years – from 2018 to 2020.
– The majority of high-ranking officials have been handed over to a court for conduct which the court considers not to constitute a crime. 11 of the 13 acquittals in the 45 cases examined are precisely due to the inconsistency of the alleged criminal conduct established by the court. The accusations of the Prosecutor’s Office are often based on the misapplication of substantive criminal law or absurd logical constructions. Significantly, the courts’ assessment is often not challenged even by the Prosecutor’s Office from one moment on in the cases.
– The state of the criminal prosecution in the most socially significant corruption cases continues to receive no attention from the leadership of the Prosecutor’s Office. No criteria have been developed for monitoring cases of corruption crimes of high public interest. It is not clear whether the reasons for the failure of significant corruption cases are analyzed at all.
– In 2020, CAFIAP issued 122 decisions. Conflict of interest was ascertained with only 30 decisions; lack of conflict of interest was ascertained in 92.
– The main part of the cases on which the Commission has ruled, 96 in number, are about persons holding public office at a relatively low local level – in the system of local self-government, local government, or local administration. Decisions concerning public officials at higher and central levels are only 26.
– The formalistic approach in case of reports to the Commission or cases exposed in the media continues to be impressive. There is often a lack of comprehensive research on possible connections that lead to influence and dependencies in the exercise of official powers by persons holding public office.
“With full gravity, we must ask the question: is this the real picture of high-level corruption?” If these cases reflect the real state of corruption in the public sector at the highest level, then the only possible conclusion is that there is no corruption there.
However, it is objectively impossible for this to be true, especially in a young democracy like Bulgaria. Therefore, we must conclude that the real picture remains hidden,” commented Andrey Yankulov, author of the first part of the report.
The full text of the report “Anti-Corruption Institutions: Escalating Problems” is available here.
The ACF’s Annual Monitoring Report for 2020, “Anti-Corruption Institutions: Escalating Problems,” was prepared within a project supported by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung under its Rule of Law Programme for Southeast Europe.
Press releases

ACF: Many Violations in the Operation of Buffer Parking Lot Near Ruse Border Crossing Part 2 of Game of Parking Lots Exposes Curious Family Ties and Shows How State Interference Supports a Monopoly

Game of Parking Lots: Persons Linked with Kapitan Andreevo Scandal Expand Their Reach to Bulgaria’s Northern Border

How Sanctioned Persons Are Visiting Bulgaria “on Medical Grounds” with the Foreign Ministry’s Approval

ACF: BACB Does Not Deny Hosting Talks Between TurkStream Tenderers

TurkStream Tenderers Also Held Secret Talks at Tzvetelina Borislavova’s Bank

Who and How Held Illegal Secret Negotiations with TurkStream Tenderers in 2019?

“Pelletgate”: firm linked to Delyan Dobrev received large amounts from Maritza 3 TPP for fictitious deliveries of biomass

ACF files a report to the Prosecutor's Office about cybercrimes committed during the electronic voting for members of the Supreme Judicial Council in June 2022

ACF's Annual Monitoring Report 2022: Institutions remain blind to high-level political corruption

Presentation of the ACF Annual Monitoring Report "Anti-Corruption Institutions 2022: Eyes Wide Shut"
The others for us

Major General Paul H. Pardew will be ACF's International Advisor

Purchased and controlled vote and trust in the electoral process

Anti-Corruption Fund Foundation held a meeting and discussion in Blagoevgrad

Andrey Yankulov to Fakti: The work of the Anti-Corruption Commission is shrouded in secrecy

Mario Rusinov on election technology and the purchased vote

The most important thing about anomaly-monitoring analyses is the politicians' awareness that they are taking place

Der Standard: As early as 2019, ACF has sent reports to the Financial Inspectorate and the Prosecutor's Office about irregularities at the Capitan Andreevo Check Point

Andrey Yankulov: It is strange that a deputy minister was dismissed after allegations of a BGN 200 000 bribe, and now he has been restored to the same position

Andrey Yankulov: The draft law about the Anti-Corruption Commission allows for external control over the Prosecutor's Office

Trading votes for firewood, or about the election frauds in the upcoming elections
Video


PELLETGATE


Game of Parking Lots: Persons Linked with Kapitan Andreevo Scandal Expand Their Reach to Bulgaria’s Northern Border


PELLETGATE


“Pelletgate”: firm linked to Delyan Dobrev received large amounts from Maritza 3 TPP for fictitious deliveries of biomass


Analysis of the ACF: GERB and the Movement for Rights and freedom win the biggest share of votes in polling stations at risk


The Rules of Bukovlak


"Our Party - Number One": Witness account of voting instead of voters and threats on election day in Breznitsa village


"How many votes do we have for Stefcho?", new witness from Simitli municipality


"How many votes do we have for Stefcho?" Another first-hand account of flagrant violations at the polling stations in Simitli, where Stefan Apostolov won 90% of the vote

