Joint Statement of Five NGOs Regarding the Procedure to Elect the New Director of the Bulgarian Anti-Corruption Commission

Joint Statement of Five NGOs Regarding the Procedure to Elect the New Director of the Bulgarian Anti-Corruption Commission “We do not want to contribute to empty of content such democratic instrument as the participation of the civil society through statements and questions in the procedure for the election of Head of the CCUAAF Commission. That kind of a “boycott” is unprecedented, yet, an inevitable step towards the exposure of an obvious cover-up of decision already taken in an opaque way.”

 

TO: TSVETA KARAYANCHEVA
HEAD OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF  THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA

 

BORIS YANKOV YACHEV
HEAD OF THE COMMISSION FOR COMBATING CORRUPTION, CONFLICT OF INTERESTS AND PARLIAMENTARY ETHICS

 

DANIELA ANASTASOVA DARITKOVA-PRODANOVA
CHAIRPERSON OF PP GERB

 

KORNELIYA PETROVA NINOVA
CHAIRPERSON OF A PP “BSP FOR BULGARIA

 

MUSTAFA SALI KARADAYI
CHAIRPERSON OF PPMOVEMENT FOR RIGHTS AND FREEDOM

 

VALENTIN KIRILOV KASABOV AND ISKREN VASILEV VESELINOV
CO-CHAIRPERSONS OF PPUNION PATRIOTS

 

GERGANA ZELYAZKOVA STEFANOVA
CHAIRPERSON OF PPVOLIATHE BULGARIAN PATRIOTS

 

INDEPENDENT MEMBERS OF PARLIMANET

 

RE: Procedure for election of a Head of the Commission for Counter-Corruption and Unlawfully Acquired Assets Forfeiture (CCUAAF)

 

 

December 2, Sofia

 

OPEN LETTER

FROM

ANTI-CORUPTION FUND

BULGARIAN LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

BULGARIAN INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL INITIATIVES

INSTITUTE FOR MARKET ECONOMY

ACCESS TO INFORMATION PROGRAMME

 

HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PARLIAMENT,

According to art. 9, subart. 5 from the от Counter-Corruption and Unlawfully Acquired Assets Forfeiture Act and § II, p. 3 from the Procedural rules for the requirements and way for suggesting candidates, submission and disclosure of documents, hearing of the candidates for election of a Head of the CCUAAF Commission, nongovernmental organizations can submit statements including also questions to the candidates nominated for this position.

Despite that legal possibility given, we are not going to take advantage of it. Our long experience in monitoring and analyzing the processes in the judicial power, human rights and rule of law, give us ground to declare that the upcoming election of a Head of the CCUAAF Commission is a predestined one.

Observing the procedures carried out at the National Assembly, we regret to say that this is just another procedure bearing defects like lack of competitiveness, lack of transparency and publicity, absence of a professional and public debate about the condition of the institution which head is going to be elected. We are convinced that sending statements and questions to the candidates will only lead to a legitimation of a façade and initially compromised procedure. We do not want to contribute to empty of content such democratic instrument as the participation of the civil society through statements and questions in the procedure for election of Head of the CCUAAF Commission. That kind of a “boycott” is an unprecedented, yet, an inevitable step towards the exposure of an obvious cover up of decision already taken in an opaque way.

The circumstances around the procedure for election of a Head of the CCUAAF Commission are casting a shadow of doubt for unclear, at least for the broad society, agreements, because it was connected with the procedure for election of a prosecutor general. We are of the opinion that a situation where an acting prosecutor general tours the parliamentary groups to collect support for his nomination for a Head of a body part of the executive power is inadmissible and almost absurd. Such actions are compromising, from its very beginning, the procedure for election of a Head of the CCUAAF Commission. They are a prerequisite for a grounded civic suspicion that the bodies in the different powers are acting in some kind of a twisted symbiosis which does not serve the democratic order of the country (art. 8 from the Constitution of the RB). It is not the personal and cadre bond among executive, judicial and legislative bodies, but the real separation of powers implemented through the principle of checks and balances which guarantees the freedom and rights of the citizens.

Honorable members of the parliament, the election of a Head of the CCUAAF Commission is of crucial importance for the Bulgarian society and its perception for justice. Your vote will decide on who will lead a body with mixed functions which can very skillfully be used for repression and misuse of power. The decision whether to strengthen the statehood or, on the contrary, to support the ongoing processes of erosion of the legal order in the country, is in your hands.

 

Respectfully:

 

Boyko Stankushev
Director
Anticorruption Fund

Dilyana Markova
Executive Director
Bulgarian Lawyers for Human Rights

Bilyana Gyaurova-Wegertseder
Director
Bulgarian Institute for Legal Initiatives

Svetla Kostadinova
Executive Director
Institute for Market Economy

D-r Gergana Jouleva
Executive Director
Access to Information Programme

 


Сподели:

Харесайте ни!


This will close in 140 seconds